Sunday, June 2, 2019

A632.1.4.RB_Multistage Decisions_Kristina Kemp


Multistage Decisions

          I’ve always thought of myself as an intuitive decision maker based on learned behaviors from past experiences both through my own and vicariously through others, but I admit, I don’t necessarily look ahead to future possibilities when making decisions.  As much as I make efforts to do so as in cases when I begin a new diet and set strict parameters for myself, ultimately, I find that although I had good intentions, the results most often show that the larger picture of the future state hadn’t been considered, resulting in failure.  When using intuition in making important decisions, I attempt to minimize risk by considering historical results to determine future expectations along with my emotions from personal thoughts.  On the flip side, dynamic decision models use math equations to make more complex decisions where the human mind falls short.

          Authors Hoch, Kunreuther, and Gunther in Wharton on Making Decisions recommend a balance between mathematics models that balance out myopic human tendencies to not think ahead and intuition in decision making.  Being aware of the dangers of being overly confident in our intuition in solving dynamic decisions and becoming clear on the implications of making the wrong decision when stakes are high is a balanced approach recommended to managers. The authors, however, emphasize when to use our intuition because most often, our everyday reasoning can lead to the most optimal decisions.  This conclusion would improve my decision making for several decisions where the stakes are high such as in the workplace in a management role where stakeholders rely on my decision making.  In such a case, it would reduce errors and subsequently save a lot of money. 

          A recent decision I made was choosing a graduate program to pursue.  In making this decision, I didn’t evaluate risk or use data.  I used intuition and took into consideration factors the following factors: I had to feel good about it, had to feel motivated by learning outcomes and objectives of the courses, there had to be a high success rate for graduates of the program, I had to consider the workload and schedule, online or classroom, I had to determine if the risk is worth the reward, as well as considering my feelings and emotions about taking the required time away from my homeschooled son. Overall, I had forecasted the Project Management program to be very beneficial all things considered, and intuitively it felt as if I was pointing myself in the right direction.

          It may be possible to predict the future impact of a decision applying optimal dynamic decision analysis only if the probability of given states at given times is determinable.  By considering a starting point, it can be solved as if it were a series of independent two-stage problems and solved through backward induction and forward thinking to the endgame or best-case scenario.  In my example, applying optimal decision analysis wouldn’t work because the total utility value is not so linear and additive.


No comments:

Post a Comment